Articles, news & legal alerts

Read the latest news from Scali Rasmussen, including legal alerts and event listings.

Published on

As auto manufacturers announce plans to add ever more electric vehicles to their product portfolios, many also are requiring their dealer bodies to make substantial investments to prepare to sell those vehicles. In some instances, the manufacturer also is attempting to assume some aspects of the sales process previously controlled by the dealer.

Published on

Ford dealers are worried that some aspects of the Model e program are a slippery slope leading to the agency model of selling vehicles. In an agency model approach, the manufacturer sets the price and manages the online customer relationship. The dealer serves as the delivery point for the vehicle.

Bridging the divide

Plans for manufacturers to satisfy car enthusiasts and dealers in an electric world

Published on

As countries around the world move forward with plans to phase out the internal combustion engine, luxury and high-performance brands are coming to grips with perhaps the most significant change in automotive history: conversion to electric vehicles (“EVs”). The change brings feelings of frustration and grief, but also anticipation and excitement to manufacturers, dealers, and customers alike.

Published on

The 2023 legislative session touched on a wide array of business topics. The new laws do not affect all businesses, but are nonetheless worth every business owner’s attention, as they may shape you conduct business in California in the future. In particular, California continues to pass legislation aimed at minimizing the impact of climate change.

Published on

As with prior years, California enacted additional legislation with the goal of limiting catalytic converter theft. Dealerships will need to take the necessary action to comply with these new laws. AB 473 is a victory for dealerships in that, among other things, it closes a loophole used by manufacturers during the Protest process. And, as with new laws governing businesses, in general, California has passed additional legislation aimed at minimizing the impact of climate change that targets the vehicle and dealership process.

Published on

Both the Federal government and California enacted legislation raising the minimum wage for certain workers. California has also passed several bills that protect employees in variety of ways relating to cannabis use, non-compete agreements, workplace safety, right to organize, retaliation, and reproductive rights.

Published on

The most important civil procedure-related bill passed by California relates to arbitration in employment actions. Previously, if a court denies an employer’s motion to compel arbitration and the employer files an appeal, the civil action was automatically stayed during the pendency of the appeal. In an effort to protect employee rights, California passed SB 365 which now gives the trial judge the discretion to stay the civil proceedings during the pendency of the appeal.

Collaboration between NLRB and OSHA

Potential impact on businesses

Published on

On October 31, 2023, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) and the Occupational Safety and Health Agency (“OSHA”) executed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) that aims to promote safe and healthy workplaces and protect workers who speak out about unsafe working conditions. As a result, employers must prepare for increased safety and health enforcement efforts by both NLRB and OSHA. The goal of this collaboration is to strengthen health and safety protections for workers. Among other matters, the MOU sets forth a process for information sharing, training, and outreach between the NLRB and OSHA.

Published on

In recent years, Cal-OSHA has modified and refined heat illness prevention requirements for outdoor work areas. Now, employers will be facing new Cal-OSHA requirements for indoor work areas. In the past several months, the Cal-OSHA Board (“Board”) has issued multiple rounds of revised standards on Indoor Heat Illness Prevention, with public comment on the most recent revisions closing on November 28, 2023. The Board is scheduled to vote on the latest version in early 2024.

Published on

In Mattson Technology, Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc., a California Court of Appeal ruled that the trial court erred by not staying Applied Materials’ (“Applied) trade secret misappropriation claims against rival Mattson Technology (“Mattson”) while Applied pursued arbitration against its ex-employee who allegedly absconded with confidential information and provided it to Mattson.

FTC amends Safeguards Rule

Non-banking financial institutions must now report data security breaches

Published on

The Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) has just approved an amendment to the Safeguards Rule of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) pertaining to reporting obligations for motor vehicle dealers for certain data breaches and other security events to the FTC.

Published on

In response to a 2021 workplace massacre at the Valley Transportation Authority in San Jose, State Senator Cortese moved to pass legislation that requires employers to implement safety plans to prepare for potential outbreaks of serious workplace violence. Senator Cortese’s work resulted in SB 553 which, after much “give-and-take” in Sacramento, was passed by the Legislature on September 20, 2023 and signed by Governor Gavin Newsom on September 30, 2023.

Published on

Employers were overwhelmed with countless obligations during the COVID-19 pandemic, through legislation and emergency standards that focused on the interests of employee safety and wage loss. However, in its recent decision in Corby Kuciemba et al. v. Victory Woodworks Inc., the California Supreme Court drew the line in favor of employers by ruling that employers are not responsible for the spread of COVID-19 to employees’ family members.

Published on

The California Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Raines v. U.S. Healthworks Medical Group, deciding a question from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals as to the possible extent of liability for business-entity agents who carry out activities regulated under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) on behalf of employers. Under the FEHA, a covered employer includes: “any person acting as an agent of an employer, directly or indirectly.”

Pages