
John P. Swenson
A well-rounded, veteran litigator and advocate for the automotive industry and financial services companies, John Swenson uses the most efficient and effective litigation strategies and techniques to reduce the costs, disruptions and risks of resolving business disputes. John has an extensive record of countering and neutralizing attacks by members of the plaintiffs’ bar against auto dealerships and by bounty hunters who bring Proposition 65 litigation against retailers and manufacturers of consumer products.
John defends commercial clients in heavily regulated industries facing an array of claims, allegations and lawsuits — from contract disputes to consumer complaints, personal injury claims and employment law issues. He achieves favorable outcomes on a range of claims, including violations of consumer protection statutes, products liability and Prop 65 lawsuits, partnership and shareholder disputes, and complex business litigation matters.
Clients particularly value John’s extensive knowledge of insurance coverage and carriers’ practices in the types of claims they must defend.
John uses the most efficient and effective litigation strategies and techniques to reduce the costs, disruptions and risks of resolving business disputes.
Litigation strategies and expert testimony
John’s experience in managing a large volume of disputes allows him to anticipate new litigation areas that consumer activists and plaintiffs’ attorneys may focus on next.
Experienced in handling substantial portfolios of cases involving asbestos, toxic torts and product liability allegations, John excels at identifying and presenting expert witnesses for testimony at deposition and trial. He draws from a cadre of specialists in engineering, automotive mechanics, accident reconstruction, medicine, fire, construction, architecture and other disciplines to strengthen clients’ cases.
For financial institutions, John has deep experience resolving litigation between financial services companies and providing regulatory compliance counsel. He is well-versed on the law of collection practices, particularly in the auto lending sector.
John extends the value of his litigation insights when drafting new construction contracts for auto dealers. When drafting contracts, he seeks to litigation-proof agreements, and he considers environmental, real estate and other key issues for dealers building and upgrading showrooms per their franchise agreements.
Business-focused litigation counsel
John appreciates that each client has his or her own risk tolerance, depending on the issue at hand and preferred approaches to settling disputes. He gains clients trust through close collaboration and communication with them and a deep understanding of their business concerns relate to the dispute.
Committed to increasing access to justice, John played a major role in a complex prop bono litigation involving a proacted dispute between low-income rent-controlled tenants and their Santa Monica landlords. John worked with the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles to achieve a $1 million settlement for his clients.
Representative matters
- Obtained favorable settlement for dealership defendant where an elderly customer and his disabled daughter sued dealership under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act among other causes of action, alleging the autonomous driving systems in new car did not function as advertised.
- Obtained a defense verdict after trial in dispute between two dealerships over a Lamborghini Urus sold via dealer-to-dealer transaction. After a lienholder reported the vehicle stolen, the buyer sued for breach of contract and promissory fraud. Following a bench trial, the court found no liability and awarded the plaintiff nothing, with each party covering their own costs.
- Successfully defended a dealership client named in multiple lawsuits following a fatal auto incident involving a previously sold vehicle. Plaintiffs alleged liability based on the dealership’s role in the sale. After confirming full DMV compliance, our team served a Code of Civil Procedure § 128.7 motion with Safe Harbor notices. As a result, all claims were voluntarily dismissed, and the dealership avoided litigation, liability, and attorney’s fees.
- Settled property damage dispute involving a luxury vehicle that was struck by an employee of a neighboring dealership while parked on our client’s service lot. Although the neighboring dealership initially denied liability, strategic negotiation led to a resolution in which they agreed to cover all payments to the customer. Our client paid no settlement funds, incurring no financial liability beyond internal costs.
- Successfully defended a dealership in arbitration over a disputed sale of a Maserati MC20. The claimant alleged breach of contract after financing fell through. The arbitrator found no contractual obligation to complete the sale and awarded zero damages, relying heavily on the legal arguments presented in our briefing.